Matt Vandart
Hot Topics Subscriber
Maybe the doberman should have it's own temperament test sport, why not, it deserves it
That assumes it even mattered to the dog before it was conceived, because if the breeder didn't understand or make an appropriate decision made on the information in the pedigree, it was just a bunch of data for the sake of having data on pretty certificates, which could then be used to print-up even more data-laden certificates.
So should it be completely on the honor system that breeders are following best practices and breeding stock that have merit? Tell me this, if the registry shouldn't be policing anything, then why even have a standard at all?
By the way, Matt Vandart - according to statistics in Australia, people are not losing interest in the breed, it has been going up in the last 10 years (although they are still nowhere near as popular as they were in the 70s and 80s).
I think most of the problems that arise with poorly bred Dobes or dogs of other breeds showing up with full papers is that the breed club has very little if any control over the breeding process. For example, in many countries you need to be a member of the Dobermann club, you need to register a kennel name, and you need to follow their procedure in order to be able to register a litter (i.e. minimum show rating, temperament test, HD results etc.).
And I'm tired of hearing your opinions on what look best suits the Dobermann, this is not a thread about C&D. C&D has nothing to do with registration, so let's stick to the topic and not turn this into another shitty bash fest.
It is starting to seem like you don't want people to even have to try to get into breeding.
I don't bash breeders in general, I just refuse to excuse people for their lack of effort in their practices. You, on the other hand, seem to try to make excuses and cover up the tracks of every bad breeder out there that gets called out, and then turn around and say that you're for the betterment of the breed. See how confusing that is, when you're trying to advise people on what red flags to look out for?Ataro somedays I have problems with some of your negativity also but you are free to your opinions. I agree the thread is suppose to be about registration and it seems you always turn it into breeder bashing or temperament bashing. I did not post the number until I had them correct from the registry. When the tail docking ban went into effect the breeders in Australia that I had the opportuntity to hear from expressed their opinon that it would hurt the breed even further. That would be directly related to c/d whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
Your comment was that People are not loosing interest in the breed there and if you look at the numbers the drop is right at 50% 1986 to 1996 3466 down to 1800 1996 to 2006 1800 down to 686 a slight increase up to 747 does not yet show a come back.
I guess I just missed the ebb and flow and upward spiral. If that is interest in the breed then as I have been saying the gene pool is in trouble. That would mean we need more good breeders.
It is starting to seem like you don't want people to even have to try to get into breeding.
You are probably right. But why would she? Just do a quick search and you can find thousands of breeders that don't have a clue what they are doing. IMO the love of the breed is not enough to call yourself a breeder.
Do you believe that these thousands of breeders all have a passion for the breed?
Absolutely not! A large group of them say their passion is the breed, but the reality is their true passion is money. You probably can make money if you don't do health testing and showing or working your dogs.
My point is that anyone with a passion for the breed will be determined enough to do something as simple as study for an exam.
Not necessarily, have you looked at websites ? There are all too many where their claimed champion is not even stacked. Why? Because they don't know how. That is not passion.
I will apologize to everyone for my Sh--- attitude I really need to clean it up and stop worrying about registraion, good/bad breeders and poor advise on training issues, temperament etc.. I did after all get all my knowledge out of a cracker jack box as some of you know.
Don't you dare! Do you really think there is something wrong with your attitude? Just look at your dogs...are you kidding me? Let's see there is Drake and River, Zeke, Redman and we can't forget Bella or Raci, the list goes on and on. Do you drive each of us as owners of those dogs crazy at one point or another? Absolutely! But it is your attitude that has made me want to continue. Where would Drake and I be without your attitude? Would he be am Intl Ch? That would be a big NO! Would we be a member of your club and working with Waine? Again, a big NO! So if you got your info from cracker jacks............. I'm off to stock up on some!
I will apologize to everyone for my Sh--- attitude I really need to clean it up and stop worrying about registraion, good/bad breeders and poor advise on training issues, temperament etc.. I did after all get all my knowledge out of a cracker jack box as some of you know.
I admit I failed to realize that new poeple to the breed who have never bred, trained or shown a dog know far more than breeders who have tried to dedicate their lives to the Doberman.
I did not realize that I could not understand a graph that goes from 3400 down to 700 shows an clear indication that the interest in the breed has remained strong.
I need to find something better than cracker jacks to educate myself I guess. Maybe I should try the funny papers next.
These are the last 7 numbers.I don't see an increase.I see a teeter-totter effect going on.I wonder how many weren't registered these years vs unreg'ed in the years past.Are the #s of the breed going away? Or are the numbers just being shifted around?I guess the(unanswerable) question better stated would be I wonder how many Dobe's were bread total per year,reg and non reg.Registrations from Australia from 1986 through 2011:
-715 - 619 - 686 - 558- 689 - 644 - 757
Again no real way of knowing for positive but ill one up ya here and say i bet the higher numbers also represent periods when the doberman lived longer and was considered a healthier breed.These are the last 7 numbers.I don't see an increase.I see a teeter-totter effect going on.I wonder how many weren't registered these years vs unreg'ed in the years past.Are the #s of the breed going away? Or are the numbers just being shifted around?I guess the(unanswerable) question better stated would be I wonder how many Dobe's were bread total per year,reg and non reg.
Here is how I see it good breeders who work hard to trail test and preserve a breed get slammed on a regular basis by people who decide it better to go buy from a person who does little to no research, precious little testing and never tested their dog beyond the dog in heat copulation. You will never convince me that is a better plan. It goes against everything that the purebred dog world is about.
What people seem to fail to understand back when purebred dogs first started forming, breeders did not know about recessive genes that might crop up in some future generations so they bred back to what they liked and was the closest to what they were trying to establish.