Some more thoughts on the American Mastiff:
I found this thread on a forum from about a dozen years ago – 2007/2008. (FYI, I believe the AM was recognized by the CKC in 2000)
The people on this Mastiff forum were sort of foaming at the mouths about the AM. Some folks were so incensed or disgusted by the fact that the AM's founders can't/won't provide exact details about what went into the breed. The people so up in arms over this were English Mastiff people. They were talking about how they, the EM folks, could trace back their dogs' lineage and so forth. Of course, someone brought up that sometime after WWII I think they said the breed needed to be rehabilitated and some crossing-in occurred. The short-haired St. Bernard was mentioned. This, in my book, takes some of the wind out of the sails of the stuffy EM folks. The EM is claimed to be this breed from antiquity – ancient times.
So yeah. On the AM, some brought up the confusion over the Anatolian "Mastiff" vs. the Anatolian Shepherd. Someone also posted a pic of a Turkish Kangal dog, implying it might be what was used. In addition to folks positing that there was the potential of temperament problems – implying dangerous aggression – they were just impugning the breed on its uncertain breeding and ancestry.
In my mind, the AM has been breeding true to type for over two decades now, and we have no shortage of legitimate-seeming testimonials on the website of the breed's founder from owners who are absolutely in love with their AMs. Some of these are in memoriam. Most of the dogs look very much the same, consistently. Most of the testimonials speak of the lovely temperament and many show kids laying on/with the massive dogs. It appears these dogs have lifespans generally longer than the Doberman.
I realize that any negative testimonials would not be put up on the website. I would like to get my eyes on some.
So yeah, it's found to be so unacceptable by some of the purebred Mastiff folks that we don't know exactly what went into the making of the American Mastiff. I wonder how folks felt back around the turn of the 20th Century about a young breed of dog that had been started by a man who chose dogs from what he got his hands on through working as a dog catcher – the breeds of which nobody really knows.
I found this thread on a forum from about a dozen years ago – 2007/2008. (FYI, I believe the AM was recognized by the CKC in 2000)
The people on this Mastiff forum were sort of foaming at the mouths about the AM. Some folks were so incensed or disgusted by the fact that the AM's founders can't/won't provide exact details about what went into the breed. The people so up in arms over this were English Mastiff people. They were talking about how they, the EM folks, could trace back their dogs' lineage and so forth. Of course, someone brought up that sometime after WWII I think they said the breed needed to be rehabilitated and some crossing-in occurred. The short-haired St. Bernard was mentioned. This, in my book, takes some of the wind out of the sails of the stuffy EM folks. The EM is claimed to be this breed from antiquity – ancient times.
So yeah. On the AM, some brought up the confusion over the Anatolian "Mastiff" vs. the Anatolian Shepherd. Someone also posted a pic of a Turkish Kangal dog, implying it might be what was used. In addition to folks positing that there was the potential of temperament problems – implying dangerous aggression – they were just impugning the breed on its uncertain breeding and ancestry.
In my mind, the AM has been breeding true to type for over two decades now, and we have no shortage of legitimate-seeming testimonials on the website of the breed's founder from owners who are absolutely in love with their AMs. Some of these are in memoriam. Most of the dogs look very much the same, consistently. Most of the testimonials speak of the lovely temperament and many show kids laying on/with the massive dogs. It appears these dogs have lifespans generally longer than the Doberman.
I realize that any negative testimonials would not be put up on the website. I would like to get my eyes on some.
So yeah, it's found to be so unacceptable by some of the purebred Mastiff folks that we don't know exactly what went into the making of the American Mastiff. I wonder how folks felt back around the turn of the 20th Century about a young breed of dog that had been started by a man who chose dogs from what he got his hands on through working as a dog catcher – the breeds of which nobody really knows.

She said, you spoil him! I said, how do I do that? She said, you actually stop mowing just to say hello to him!
But of course! 





