Muscle!

This is funny to me, because my dog is heavier than I want right now, and when I sent a picture to his breeders (both conformation people) they both said he was at a great weight! I was looking at him from a sport perspective, thinking “dude, you’re getting chonky.” View attachment 159883
I never really understood the concept of “show weight”, especially when this is the second line of our standard: “compactly built, muscular and powerful, for great endurance and speed.” I’ve never had a judge comment on weight/condition so I just keep my dog as he is.

This is him now and I wouldn’t like him heavier than this. I’m showing in two weeks so we’ll see if I get any comments. 😂IMG_1861.webp
 
I never really understood the concept of “show weight”, especially when this is the second line of our standard: “compactly built, muscular and powerful, for great endurance and speed.” I’ve never had a judge comment on weight/condition so I just keep my dog as he is.

This is him now and I wouldn’t like him heavier than this. I’m showing in two weeks so we’ll see if I get any comments. 😂View attachment 159892
He’s handsome! I asked a long-time Doberman person about the “show weight” vs “sport weight” stuff once. She said a little surface fat will round out a dog and help the eye flow over each area and can help hide minor faults. I am not a conformation person at all. In the last three years in Dobermans I’ve become better at seeing a correct dog, but when I see a poorly bred dog with major faults I’m not yet good enough to say what exactly is “off.” I can just tell something isn’t quite right, sometimes I can tell if it’s the front or the back, but sometimes I’ll see a dog and be like “is that a bad rear?” and someone will say, actually the rear angulation is fine but the front is off so it makes the rear look funny too.

I think a well-conditioned dog having good muscle tone would do the same as a dog with “a little surface fat.” In my book, it’s way better.
 

Back
Top