kevn
Active Member
I have a few questions on a controversial topic:
I understand that the "Z" in a Doberman's AKC registration number indicates an ancestor who was an albino. My doberman has a "Z" in her registration. I have her 3 generation pedigree that shows quite a few "Z"s, but no albinos, or whites, only the four AKC accepted colors: black, red, blue and fawn. She is totally black and tan, and has had zero health problems at 9 months, and has a wonderful disposition and is very smart.
I know that many reputable breeders insist that a Doberman with a "Z" should never be bred. This is also condemned by the DCPA. However, the AKC granted my girl full registration, so her litter with a full-bred registered Doberman, even with a Z, would allow the litter to also be fully registered as full bred, not "conditional" with no mention of warnings about breeding. If the AKC thought there was a problem with breeding a Doberman with a "Z", it seems like they would only offer "conditional" registration. Why is there a difference in opinion between the AKC and the DPCA?
I know the argument that albinos have health problems, and that there was a lot of inbreeding to propagate the white color, so descendents of these dogs should not be allowed to propagate. On the other hand, there was a lot of inbreeding to create the breed in the first place, and I am sure that if you go back far enough in any breed, you will likely find an albino.
Is the "Z" really an issue? There are dobermans with a "Z" in their registration who have excellent health, and dobermans who do not have a "Z", who have very poor health. Has anyone actually done a statistical study to determine if the "Z" in an AKC registration number really has scientifically significant consequences in breeding?
Kevin
I understand that the "Z" in a Doberman's AKC registration number indicates an ancestor who was an albino. My doberman has a "Z" in her registration. I have her 3 generation pedigree that shows quite a few "Z"s, but no albinos, or whites, only the four AKC accepted colors: black, red, blue and fawn. She is totally black and tan, and has had zero health problems at 9 months, and has a wonderful disposition and is very smart.
I know that many reputable breeders insist that a Doberman with a "Z" should never be bred. This is also condemned by the DCPA. However, the AKC granted my girl full registration, so her litter with a full-bred registered Doberman, even with a Z, would allow the litter to also be fully registered as full bred, not "conditional" with no mention of warnings about breeding. If the AKC thought there was a problem with breeding a Doberman with a "Z", it seems like they would only offer "conditional" registration. Why is there a difference in opinion between the AKC and the DPCA?
I know the argument that albinos have health problems, and that there was a lot of inbreeding to propagate the white color, so descendents of these dogs should not be allowed to propagate. On the other hand, there was a lot of inbreeding to create the breed in the first place, and I am sure that if you go back far enough in any breed, you will likely find an albino.
Is the "Z" really an issue? There are dobermans with a "Z" in their registration who have excellent health, and dobermans who do not have a "Z", who have very poor health. Has anyone actually done a statistical study to determine if the "Z" in an AKC registration number really has scientifically significant consequences in breeding?
Kevin
