Okay, I know I am new but I have to chime in.
I do not know very much about canine genetics beyond the basics such as canines have 39 chromosomal pairs, one pair sexual and the rest are autosomal, etc.
I do know more than the average person about how genetics operate in general with more specific knowledge of how they operate in humans. Although I am no expert by any means. I do have the ability to understand the findings of those experts.
I have to disagree with the inference of this definition of a mutation:
Genetics.
A change of the DNA sequence within a gene or chromosome of an organism resulting in the creation of a new character or trait not found in the parental type.
originally written by Silent
The definition is technically correct, but is misleading. It does not tell you how any one mutation behaves, how it is expressed, or inherited. It does not differentiate between genotype and phenotype.
For those who are unfamiliar with the terms, the phenotype is all of the genes that an organism possesses in their genetic make-up. Half of those genes are supplied by each of their parent donors. The genotype is the genes that are being expressed in that organism. They ar the active genes. The rest lay dormant but can still be passed onto the organisms offspring. A mutation can occur in the genotype of an organism that was not in the genotype of it's parents, but not be expressed in the organism's phenotype.
The mutation of albinism only occurs in a single gene, not a single gene pairing. It is a recessive gene. It takes two recessives for the organism to express the trait. Since when the mutation of albinism occurs it only occurs in one of the genes in the pairing it is not expressed phenotypically by the organism in which the mutation originally occurs. The recessive gene of albinism can be passed on from parent to offspring genotypically throughout the generations without ever being expressed. It remains hidden in the gene pool until a carrier reproduces with another carrier and
both by chance donate the recessive to one of thier offspring.
In order for an organism to express (be affected by) albinism they have to inherit the recessive mutation from both parents.
In the case of the white doberman Padula's Queen of Sheba, she may have been the first recorded white doberman but both of her parents had to already possess the mutated gene. There is no way to determine how far back in each of her parent's family lines the mutation extends, but both family lines have to contain the mutation.
vWD is a similar mutation in how in how it is transmitted and expressed.
I am in no way claiming whether or not I know the white dobe to be an albino. I don't. It has not been proven one way or another. I will wait for the experts to decide. The only thing the experts can tell us is what it is not. It is not the more debilitating form of Tyrosinase Negative Albinism.
In my opinion, a mutation is a mutation. Some mutations affect the organism more severly than others. Every genome has them and the doberman genome is not excluded from that fact.
Like vWD the albino mutation is carried recessively throughout generations without being expressed. Careful breeding of carriers to clears can manage the mutation without severely limiting the doberman gene pool.
Lovers of the breed get too emotionally invested sometimes to think of the situation rationally. The z-list should be used to determine which dogs *may* be carriers. This is the best we can do because we do not currently have a test to determine which dogs are definitively carriers like we do with vWD. Thank God, because vWD is a much more debilitating mutation.
However, using the z-list to eliminate all dogs from breeding that *may* carry a gene that inconclusively is the genetic mutation of albinism no matter how many positive traits they carry with them would have the same effect as eliminating vWD from the doberman's genetic pool.
To truly eliminate the white doberman (under the assumption that is is caused by albinism), you would have to spay/neuter every dobe that has a single shared ancestor of Padula's Queen of Sheba, no matter how far back in the lines that ancestor is.
Albinism, like every mutation, is a spontaneous albeit extremely rare occurrence. To eliminate it from the doberman's gene pool you would have to do the same if it ever occurs again.
All mutations occur more frequently the more the gene pool is limited. The gene pool is limited in dobermans by selective breeding to maintain the standard. It is just a necessary evil. Line breeding (or inbreeding) is used to lock in exemplary traits. This type of breeding locks in these exemplary traits by reducing the number of traits that can be selected from (as both parents carry the same copies of the gene) to hand down to offspring, again reducing the gene pool. It may be useful in maintaining the breed type, but it also exposes recessive traits that may be undesirable and hidden like the mutations of vWD and albinism.
Further reducing the gene pool by removing from breeding every family line that may contain the mutation once it appears would only exacerbate the problem, not solve it. In essence by removing the mutation from the gene pool you increase the odds of it occuring again. If you continue to try to remove these mutations by further reducing the gene pool then other, likely more debilitating mutations than either vWD or albinism, will occur. This is known genetically as "bottlenecking". Continuing on this trend reduces the number of "standard" to choose from generation after generation until there is no choice but to inbreed until the breed is gone.
With careful management, not elimination, of undesirable traits selective breeding can produce both excellent representations of the breed and keep them around long enough for future generations to enjoy them.
I am not suggesting anyone should embrace the white doberman, nor am I suggesting that anyone should or should not breed for whites. I do not know if it is the genetic mutation of albinism.
I am highly dubious of the wisdom in spaying/neutering all z-factored dobermans out of fear of producing a white, especially when the dog is merely a possible carrier. It has me baffled as logically vWD is a more dangerous mutation and does not engender the same response.