So the thing about the FKC Dobe Cross Breed Project thats interesting is they have tools to measure genetic diversity as well as the recorded pedigree, to identify parentage and recorded problems to attempt to select away from inherited diseases.
This speeds things up, if I am understanding
@Ravenbird - we dont have to wait for the pups to mature and be born and live awhile awaiting outcomes, for four generations. That "purely by phenotype" process would be 8+ years, at earliest correct?
I recall Greunig complaining about breeding in the black greyhound "Stella" for coat color because it took three generations to understand what you got in addition- he called "stupidity" of the Greyhound, that had to be bred out later.
I'm assuming there has been some hypothetical and computer modeled combinations based on "teh science" but until we see some of that published by the FKC or dobe breed club or the folks in charge of the project, its interesting speculation.
I wonder which university scientists might be involved? U Helsinki? Any others doing behavioral research thats quantified in dobes?
Thats the secret sauce,
the "nurture" part to go with "nature" part in genetics...
I was thinking about
@Nordika question on U Virgina research on speckle analysis...
I was trying to get some idea who are the key scientists in dobe or wider dog genetic reseach, and
@Ravenbird I was fooling around with the Grok AI as a search tool.
Scientists have to compete for grants, funding and of course once thats underway have to carefully guard resukts until publication.
But if you look at university puff pieces and announcements of new people hired, or projects proposed you can make guesses.
I'm just guessing there are people close to those on FKC and their Nordic Club collaboration with other breed clubs, and university folk involved...
So thats the nose work for ya, anyone who is interested who has more experience and understanding of genetics, than I.