omg . . . that was absolutely sick to do that.....I wish Cato a speedy recovery.
Robin, Cato is 10+ months old and very happy. His suffering with the ears is long past, but thanks for your concern for his welfare.

omg . . . that was absolutely sick to do that.....I wish Cato a speedy recovery.

According to her Facebook a z factored litter was set for June 14th.
I think the reason it turned into about the breeder is because of the choice of vet the breeder chooses to use for ear cropping. I understand you are happy with Cato and I hope you continue to make others aware to not support the breeder unless she changes vets. I honestly don't see how a breeder cannot see that method of choice for posting by stringing the ears up like that is acceptable...ignorant or not. Also, if anyone else wants to look it is not very hard to find the breeder based on the info supplied and I did find recent pics, awful pics at that, of said breeder's most recent litter of puppies with their ears strung up. I really hope she gets the msg and switches vets for the puppies sake. I can't imagine the damage that would happen if a littermate's paw got slipped in there and pulled that strand of suture out by accident.
I suspect that anyone can sue for about anything as long as the court agrees. There are other bodies to use for the same gain like the SPCA, or better yet, local breeders clubs and animal protection agencies on a more local level. The SPCA and PETA are not thought of too highly in my community, and n my house.
While I personally have not encountered a vet who strings ears like this it is within the scope of cropping. Most vets have much improved their methods and now use the styrofoam cups instead as it is much kinder. So again the vet is performing within his methods and is not actually doing anything out of line. Just not popular with the majority today.
Frivilous law suits cost us all and I honestly just don't see a pray of you even getting to first base. Courts do not and should not be ruling on different methods of cropping or aftercare.
Not true - Frivilous law suits are a waste of time. You have to be able to prove some kind of loss to make it worth while. The court is not set up to handle cases just because someone is not happy with how something they did not supervise or have control over was done. You bought the puppy. You supported a less than reputable breeder and OMG I won't even touch ont the low lives that breed Z factored. GAG GAG GAG
Yes Gel I am woman hear me roar!!!
. You are right in your judgement of frivolous law suits. We all lose in one way or another. Finding this forum was a blessing. I have a couple of gal friends who are clients of this breeder. While I do not feel responsible for these two, I do like them both and would hope to talk some sense into their heads.
Sosthenes we are glad you are hear too. We all learn by these discussions - whether good or bad people opinions and knowledge do matter and we hopefully can help each other in some small way understand better.
I hav often said since I did not even know about z factored when I got my first Doberman but by the grace of God there go I. I dodged the bullet but some are not so lucky. These Z factored breeders start breeding a a lie and it just goes downhill from there.
While we will always wonder if this guy could do the work, we are happy with him and he seems contented. He is a lover of his masters.Dobs4EverD4E?

You are?I guess I missed that all together.I do agree with your statement though.BTW.....I am disabled not handicapped. Handicapped implies or describes one who stands or sits on a street corner with his cap in hand begging. A panhandler.
While I personally have not encountered a vet who strings ears like this it is within the scope of cropping. Most vets have much improved their methods and now use the styrofoam cups instead as it is much kinder. So again the vet is performing within his methods and is not actually doing anything out of line. Just not popular with the majority today.
Frivilous law suits cost us all and I honestly just don't see a pray of you even getting to first base. Courts do not and should not be ruling on different methods of cropping or aftercare.
Not true - Frivilous law suits are a waste of time. You have to be able to prove some kind of loss to make it worth while. The court is not set up to handle cases just because someone is not happy with how something they did not supervise or have control over was done. You bought the puppy. You supported a less than reputable breeder and OMG I won't even touch ont the low lives that breed Z factored. GAG GAG GAG
Yes Gel I am woman hear me roar!!!
Ah,I missed this.I am aware,and I have heard(read) you roar.I like it when you roar

Dobs4Ever
You are?I guess I missed that all together.I do agree with your statement though.
Thanks.Z factors means the dog is a descent of Sheba who produced the first albino litter. DPCA fought hard to get their reg # with a Z so that the pure gene pool could be protected. They are not suppose to be bread and are banned from showing in conformation events. You can go to DPCA>org and read theri white out program. They are banned by their own breed club as they are a defective mutated gene.
Since some of the dog that could carry the gene are blacks, reds, blues and fawns you can't see the Z so their reg is is WZ####
You can go to DPCA>org and read their white out program. They are banned by their own breed club as they are a defective mutated gene.