Within seconds Daisy went into aggressive mode. She's not trained to bite so I don't think that would be the result if the intruder kept pushing.
Well...you have answered your own question with your last remark..
Any dog can show protective aggression to a stranger but showing aggression is one thing, taking it to the next level and attacking when pushed is another.
Training is absolutely necessary to show the later behaviour, but the dog has to have that fight drive in him/her to start with..


We've seen this video before,my opinions have not changed.
The test is somewhat bogus.
Two are by themselves,one is with its owner.
The commentator says something to the effect the dog kept looking to its owner for direction and looked confused?
Maybe he was?He had little training.Imo he did what he was supposed to,look to the owner/handler for command,and when given he acted.
We have yet to see one of these tests with a Doberman.
My comment from the other thread also stands
Hey!Mike Mendoza!!
I volunteer my house and 2 Dobermans for the next test!!!
**Of course a document releasing me of any liability of personal injury to Mr.Mendoza will be required**
![]()
You don't think a dog would act differently if the owner is there vs not there?It doesn't mater if the dog is on its own or with the owner..point is how do they act if an intruder breaks into their property.
After all, a guard dog should be able to do his/her job of guarding without owner/trainer being present..
The point made in this video is that any dog will make a noise to a stranger, but will they take it into the next level and put up a fight if they were put under pressure?
As much as we would like to think they would....
Unless they have the nerve & been trained, they will NOT!!

You don't think a dog would act differently if the owner is there vs not there?
Please don't take this the wrong way but I wish you lived closer,we could test your theory.![]()
My point,from the first post was the test is skewed.What i am saying is, if the dog has the nerve and is trained, he/she should be able to do his/her job without the owner/trainer being present.
What is your point that I seem to be missing?

. We actually were talking about this last night. I have many many grown children that are random in and out visiting and the such, last night I was lying on the couch and Josh came in and the dogs, stood up and immediately tails (butts) going, we were in the basement so I suppose they knew his 6'4 240 stomp as he was headed down stairs, James had lagged behind checking the mail and came in about 5 minutes later, I knew he was here but the dogs didn't and they both jumped to full alert as they heard the door quietly open, then they were immediately embarrassed as they realized it was James, all that to say this, I think they are a lot smarter than we give them credit for. mine seem to know when something isn't right, but I do think they are more geared to protect you then they are to guard when they are alone. Back in the 70's my dad had our first doberman, she was trained to protect the truck with his tools in it, no one could come near that truck if she was told to "watch it" so I know they can be trained do just about anythingYou really don't have to take that attitude.if you say so..
You really don't have to take that attitude.
If you can't see the difference in the test models....
Can you at least see the lack of knowledge on the part of the commentator?
The dog with owner did just as it should have IMO,look to the handler for command.It did not look "confused" to me?
And....
As a matter of fact,a few years ago a member here had her dogs stop a dirtbag,they both jumped into action to prevent their owner from being attacked and probably car jacked in a parking lot.....zero training to do so.