http://m.dogbreedinfo.com/?url=http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/terms.htm#3052 this link may help define some of the terms used in the standard
Edited at the request of Kitty's Mom:
I've learned something today. Not all web sites and search engine results are created equally. The "M" link for mobile devices allows you to read a simple definition of terms like croup and stop. When I searched and pulled it up on my phone, I thought the wording would be very helpful. However, that link won't open on the main site when accessed from a computer. I can't even find the definitions on the main site. Which sucks because I'd like to copy and paste some of the info here to restore some credibility to my original intent and post.
When life hands you lemons, make lemonade. When life hands you limes, grab the tequila. I think some of these folks had too many limes on their hands.

With that said, the pictures on this site may be quite helpful.
It is difficult to evaluate and critique a quality dog. If two dogs meet the standard, it comes down to literally splitting hairs to determine which dog is the best and that is subjective and based on opinion on that particular day. Maybe using some of the pictures from this site will help us understand the terms and definitions in the standard by demonstrating the faults. Some of these dogs are "wrong" in so many ways.
While I'm sure these dogs are loved by their owners, and may be the sweetest, most wonderful family dogs, I can guarantee that they are a far cry from the DPCA's standard. Even without the proper stack, you can see some of the issues.
Let's critique these dogs to help us learn to critique our own.