UDC is more working lines but you see all kinds there; especially for conformation and OB. Remy would probably do well since he isn't one of the over refined, fragile looking dogs.are the UDC shows more for working line Dobermans?
That’s what I was wondering, I wasn’t sure if he would fit in at that show. When I looked at some pictures from past events I saw a mix of dogs. Some who look more like what you’d see at an AKC show and some who probably wouldn’t do well there, but winning at UDC.UDC is more working lines but you see all kinds there; especially for conformation and OB. Remy would probably do well since he isn't one of the over refined, fragile looking dogs.
They judge by the very same standard. You are also required to take an age appropriate Temperament Test. I'll see if I can copy an announcement I saw on FB with an explain how it works. The nice thing is, I think it's more informal, most of them don't show outside UDC.Maybe a silly question, but are the UDC shows more for working line Dobermans? I am thinking about going if I have time to get Remy (and myself) some more experience before his AKC shows in July.
I was reading a little about the temperament testing. He’d have to take the YTT (12-24 months old). I couldn’t find much on the actual test itself, but from what I did read I think he’ll have no issue passing. It seems like a shorter version of the WAE? I thought it was kind of interesting the temperament test is required to be taken before showing, but it’s not required to be passed. Although they won’t award certain things to dogs who fail the TT.They judge by the very same standard. You are also required to take an age appropriate Temperament Test. I'll see if I can copy an announcement I saw on FB with an explain how it works. The nice thing is, I think it's more informal, most of them don't show outside UDC.
Because UDC focus is all about preserving the working doberman, but want to encourage correct conformation - goals for the "total Doberman". If a dog passed the TT but was grossly out of standard, it would not fly. Likewise, a beautiful dog within standard that failed the TT would not be eligible for UDC CH, but still could win or place in a class. This could give that owner information to work on the TT - see if the dogs inherent reactions can be adjusted and/or what to look for in a mate to offset those traits if your breeding.I thought it was kind of interesting the temperament test is required to be taken before showing, but it’s not required to be passed. Although they won’t award certain things to dogs who fail the TT.
Because these dogs are mostly of Euro heritage and not leaning toward picture perfect or trends of AKC showlines. Most members in UDC are into sports and will choose a good proven working line because looks are secondary to action. I am seeing more show/sport dogs coming into to the club. Hopefully the crossovers will help both sides out! UDC is about dogs who can work but to be a CH they insist the working Dobe to also fit the standard. A pretty dog that fails the TT also doesn't fit into their ideal working Doberman description so UDC CH title remains special by being proven in both looks and temperament. Ripley could probably get a USC CH in a snap!no offense some of the quality of dogs I've seen is quite questionable.
This is what I meant by my "quality of dogs that I've seen is questionable" comment. Questionable as in, not fitting the standard in more than just a few deviationsbut to be a CH they insist the working Dobe to also fit the standard
But its like UKC where, if that is the best dog of the day, it will win. Same goes with AKC too but fortunately there is more quality there so the lesser quality don't typically make it out of the classes. Some judges will even with hold ribbons, more really should. Its not a judging match against each other, its what dog fits the standard the closest with the least amount of faults or deviations. Your dog is competing against the standard. Too many faults and you have a dog deviating from the standard where it shouldn't even win.Why does that hurt? For the most part these are extremely sound dogs! The look of most working dogs is the look they've had for years and years, only breeding what works, not following judging trends. Only in the last 20 years has this issue of bigger fronts come up. And maybe 5 - 10% of show pedigrees has a dog with sport titles. Until those dogs are jumping 39" with a 4 ib dumbbell I can't agree that the latest trends are the best way to go. I like a good looking dog as much as the next person, I'm floored by the beauty of some of these dogs. But if it costs the breed their original function then it's meaningless. It's why I DO want you and others to get out and prove that there are lines of show dogs that can work. They've already proven for 5 generations that they gorgeous - someone needs to convince working line breeders that they can infuse more "pretty" without losing the drive, bite and nerve. I'm definitely excited to see you and a few others try out bite sports and push that ceiling. Just like show folks don't want to lower their standards to a lesser dog, working dog breeders don't want to lower their standards to a dog with 5 generations of no physically challenging titles from field work. It's a stalemate. You won't see working lines in the show ring because even if they were 100% to standard, they would not be pinned because they aren't eye-catching. But your show dogs have a chance at IGP because opinion doesn't enter the picture. Your dog does the work or not. No opinions if the head planes are not perfectly parallel or the shoulder needs 2° more slope.Nothing hurts me more than to see a working doberman with a straight as a board front or straight rear and watching them scale the A frame or jump the high jump. It just hurts to see.
100% agree! We're not arguing, I love everything about us defending our love of the dog and what we personally think is most important. It's what makes the world go 'round.I hope if those that show in AKC come over we'll see less of a divide. I applaud the idea though and requirements laid out, it is a good start to getting there: "pretty to standard dobermans that can work and working dobermans that are bred to standard and are pretty" to where there is NO difference and we have the same dog through and through. Not arguing, and I realize UDC is trying, just fleshing out some thoughts I've had over the years.
I'm not talking trends, I'm talking about breeding to the standardI can't agree that the latest trends are the best way to go.
Because structure is incredibly important for a sound dog. Dogs carry 60-70% of their weight on their front end. Straight fronts are designed for running, not agility and jumping. The front is not only responsible for carrying weight but also absorbs almost all the impact. As you know dogs have no collar bones and the shoulder is only held on by muscle and ligaments. Slamming all of their weight into their front ends when they land and turn, if not built correctly, is more susceptible to injury. A straighter front also equals a bad neck set. So when these dogs are hitting that sleeve... Then your rear angulation is important for jumping and turning again. Straight rears are prone to ccl tears. Good rear angulation gives you good ground movement and ground cover.Why does that hurt?
Thanks. It's not for a lack of want. It's expensive... I'm lucky I have a club nearish that does know other breeds but we go to club about twice a month, more as we are able, due to finances and time (there's that issue I mentioned). Fortunately, it gives us just enough to chew on to then go work on it at home and come back to get some more info and see how we are doing. Ripley seems to have what it takes to get an IGP1 and for sure a BH but I fear we are short on time. Trendy is even better. Her sire has no sport titles. Ripley's parents didn't either. The workability is still there. Ill have to focus only on IGP with her if I want her to go far. I'm not sure because I love so many other sports too to give them up.I'm definitely excited to see you and a few others try out bite sports and push that ceiling.
Thank you for all of the information!Hi ya'll, member of the Old North State Working Doberman club here. We welcome all to this show! Yes, UDC conformation shows do judge to the AKC (DPCA) standard. However, a UDC champion is not about how many other dobermans they have beaten (the AKC point schedule is ridiculous). They have to pass the temperament test, get an Excellent rating under 3 separate approved judges and have a performance title. An Excellent rating says this dog fits the standard, but not necessarily be the ultra elegant style you see winning at the big AKC shows. You will also see all natural ears and tails at these shows. A UDC champion is closer to a DPCA ROM in that they have been proven in temperament, conformation and performance. Further, only dogs that pass the TT and get E ratings are able to move on to Winners or the BOB class. So if the quality of dogs at a show is low, there could be NO BOB awarded. Quite a bit different than AKC!
@remy the Youth TT differs only from the Adult in that there is no gun shot.
Awesome, he'll do great!Entry is in and the hotel is booked! I’ll update after the show on his show thread.

I think we need to look to the parent breed club (DPCA) to support the well balanced dog. I do think they have the right idea with awarding the ROM for dogs that have shown temperament, conformation and performance. But AKC shows are difficult. especially in the Doberman ring with the high number of pro handlers who are expert at show casing an entry's strengths, while downplaying any faults. This is why I like the UDC shows, you will know WHY your dog did or didn't achieve the Excellent rating with the critique. And if your dog goes Winners or even Best of Breed we offer nice trophies and Rosettes+1, hoping for more info.
AKC seems a bit out of touch to me, for breed standards that emphasize fashion vs something that supports a well balanced dog, with working capability AND temperament.
But the explanation of expense in time and money helps explain why.
I really appreciate the measured debate and good natured explanations here, with respect for others input.
Typically owners are handling their own dogs at UDC shows, so more of a level playing field as well!The DPCA also encourages and rewards that. The ROM (Register of Merit) is a title awarded to dogs who have their CH, a working title, and passed the WAE (doberman temperament test). ROM dogs are then placed on the DPCA website, sent their title certificate in the mail, acknowledged in the DPCA yearly review magazine, and acknowledged at National.AKC seems a bit out of touch to me, for breed standards that emphasize fashion vs something that supports a well balanced dog, with working capability AND temperament.
I agree. Owner handling is incredibly difficult. I do wish AKC did written critiques though I couldn't imagine the amount of time that would add onto an already longer day due to the amount of high entries dobes typically get, at least in my area. More judges would have to be hired to handle all of the breeds in a day which means more money on clubs that are already struggling which means higher entry fees. UDC has the advantage of judging one breed.But AKC shows are difficult. especially in the Doberman ring with the high number of pro handlers who are expert at show casing an entry's strengths, while downplaying any faults. This is why I like the UDC shows, you will know WHY your dog did or didn't achieve the Excellent rating with the critique.
Go for it!!Entry is in and the hotel is booked! I’ll update after the show on his show thread.