The AKC results for lifetime speed of Thor
https://www.apps.akc.org/apps/fastcat_ranking/index.cfm?display are based on his 3 fastest speeds — 2018 at 26.63 mph, 2019 at 26.63. Toss in the 34.89 mph shown in the screenshot and the average hits 30 +- as shown in the lifetime ranking. AKC does not show an entry for that 34.89 mph from any sanctioned AKC events from 2016 to 2026.
Bottom line is — a Doberman was clocked at 35 mph give or take a millisecond and the Doberman Planet guy had it right.

although 28 - 30 mph appears to be the most common high number for Dobes.
Preamble is warranted therefore in reference to the Freedom video a heads up is offered.
If someone wants to play with speed estimates without entering a Fast CAT event — and without climbing onto an ATV on a gravel‑strewn county road while trying to trigger prey drive to chase — there is a far safer method. A simple recall over a known distance (100 yards, or whatever distance you choose) on flat, safe terrain that meets AKC‑style footing guidelines gives you all the data you need. A favourite prey inciting tug or launched toy animated to attract the dog's attention is the catalyst to incite drive and hence enthusiasm. Use a stopwatch for accuracy, or the old “one Miss‑is‑sip‑ee” count, where each syllable is roughly one‑fifth of a second and the full phrase approximates one second. Then plug the known distance and time into any basic speed calculator. Determine the 100 yard distance via a know number paces within a measurable 10 ft segment or GPS the distance via the satellite bird's eye view
HERE
For those who dislike math or distrust AI, the calculator does the work for you: enter distance and time, and it returns the speed.
HERE
You may ask, “Why all the nerdy, overly detailed explanation?” Because it’s the only rational alternative to the DIY method — and avoiding need — of riding an ATV, keeping one eye on the road, one eye on the speedometer, and — if you have a spare — a third eye on the rear‑view mirror to see where the dog is.
If you’re still with me, here comes the nerdier part. If not, feel free to bail out now.
For the nerdy-minded 'kin' who enjoy the nerdy explanation : think force, load, foot‑pounds, and biomechanics. What does that actually mean?
In the referenced Freedom video, the Doberman weighs 100 pounds pre-determined by poster's admission. At normal speed, you can’t see the forelimb impact clearly, but slow‑motion shows the lead forelimb taking the initial load every stride. Only one front leading forelimb absorbs that force at a time. A 100‑pound dog running 30 mph doesn’t simply load that limb with 100 pounds — the peak load becomes several times body weight. Three hundred pounds is a conservative estimate. Picture the 300–400 lb barbell on the bench‑press rack at your local Gold’s Gym. That’s the kind of load being transmitted into the pastern, tendons, ligaments, and pads when being in contact by loose gravel in a steady stream when viewed at stop/start intervals.
Now shift to the world of Thoroughbred racing. This is not comparing apples to oranges — both are four‑legged animals with the same gaits: pace, trot, gallop, and full sprint. And both face similar biomechanical vulnerabilities especially at peak speeds. Modern racetracks are engineered to absorb impact because hard, unforgiving surfaces were contributing to catastrophic breakdowns. Entire tracks were torn up and rebuilt to reduce limb‑loading shock.
With that in mind, it should be obvious why a rigid, non‑absorbing in places sharp gravel surface is a terrible choice for a dog being pushed beyond its natural comfort zone for a two‑minute endurance run. Gravel is quarried stone — sharp, angular, abrasive. Think about what that means for exposed pads, digits, and pasterns.
Some may argue that the dog in the video “was fine” because it walked away without visible injury. But the cupped, hanging tongue showed dehydration and over‑extension. Absence of immediate injury does not equal responsible handling.
The point is not to be PETA‑esque, “Karen‑ish,” or bubble‑wrapping. The point is simple: it is irresponsible to subject a dog to a hazardous, high‑speed run on a gravel shoulder. There are safer, smarter, and far more controlled ways to evaluate speed.