Dobs4ever
Hot Topics Subscriber
First - I am not knocking anyones dog - Cropped or not - I do understand that many have lost the right to crop so it would be pointless for them to argue for cropping when they can't do it. They have long ago become accustomed to the look - I am solidly against loosing the standard or people who think they want the dummied down look so poeple don't regonize it as a Doberman and/or people who want to do their own thing.
That is not what purebred dogs are about. They are about following a standard.
What do you think would happen if we throw the standards out for purebred dogs??? Do they all become "Designer Dogs"??? How do you recognize one dog breed from the other???
DV in your post you said your girl was 27 inches and you were not going to show her now she is 1/2 inch over the standard that is what I was referring too. a 1/2 inch is in no way out of bounds and I don't have a problem with it. But I don't let other people decide for me what I will or won't do. . Canada did change its standard in the hopes of not loosing cropping - again they felt it better to try to give an inch in hopes of saving the whole - it won't work as history proves. Let's see - that's how the rest lost it -
When you talk about implementing rules about breeding then what if the first dogs eliminated are yours???? How would you feel if the dog warden came in and said you can't show or breed that dog because it is not within the rules??? Remember this is the govt speaking - who has never bred any dog and most liekly never attended a dog show in their life - do you really want them deciding for you???
Good breeders will breed for the best that they can produce - that would automatically eliminate them breeding oversized, albinos, more than 3 missing teeth, stove pipe neck, tubular body shape, splayed feet you name it. Good breeders work to get it right. While it is true there is not perfect dog and all have faults does that mean we should just throw otu the standard???
It is the standard of our dogs that I am so strongly for. IT is the right to crop and dock. I dont' like tails at all that is my personal feeling so guess what I picked a breed that is docked. Like Herr Dobermann the tail just gets in the way, is easily damaged, knocks everything over and stings when it is switching around. So I am quite happy with the standard as origianlly written. That is what I want to keep. What everyone else does not seem to understand is that it will be the demise of the breed. DPCA is fighting hard right now to keep the standard from being opened because once it is opened the breed is lost. Then others will be making the decisions not people who know the Doberman like the back of their hand.
Look at what happened to Australia the first year the ban was in place reg dropped by 50%??? That is a hugh drop. We can't afford that kind of drop in reg and the breed sustain itself.
If you are trying to tell me appearance does not matter I beg to differ - Look at the money people spend on image, plastic surgery, cosemetics, hair dressing and color - appearance matters. Why are there more uncropped dogs in rescue -
And I still want to know where you see so many ugly cropped dogs. If Canada has embraced floopy earred dogs then it is their loss. I see far more uncropped very very poorly bred dobermans - just visit any of the rescues - it is obvious that they did not come from top breeders. who were following a standard.
If you could please explain the statment about the 2 major surgeries - are you referring to copping and docking and spay/neuter or what was that in reference to??? Just so you know cropping and dockingis not a major surgery - It is not invasive and puppies are cropped at 3 to 5 days of age plus dews removed - all non invasive.
That is not what purebred dogs are about. They are about following a standard.
What do you think would happen if we throw the standards out for purebred dogs??? Do they all become "Designer Dogs"??? How do you recognize one dog breed from the other???
DV in your post you said your girl was 27 inches and you were not going to show her now she is 1/2 inch over the standard that is what I was referring too. a 1/2 inch is in no way out of bounds and I don't have a problem with it. But I don't let other people decide for me what I will or won't do. . Canada did change its standard in the hopes of not loosing cropping - again they felt it better to try to give an inch in hopes of saving the whole - it won't work as history proves. Let's see - that's how the rest lost it -
When you talk about implementing rules about breeding then what if the first dogs eliminated are yours???? How would you feel if the dog warden came in and said you can't show or breed that dog because it is not within the rules??? Remember this is the govt speaking - who has never bred any dog and most liekly never attended a dog show in their life - do you really want them deciding for you???
Good breeders will breed for the best that they can produce - that would automatically eliminate them breeding oversized, albinos, more than 3 missing teeth, stove pipe neck, tubular body shape, splayed feet you name it. Good breeders work to get it right. While it is true there is not perfect dog and all have faults does that mean we should just throw otu the standard???
It is the standard of our dogs that I am so strongly for. IT is the right to crop and dock. I dont' like tails at all that is my personal feeling so guess what I picked a breed that is docked. Like Herr Dobermann the tail just gets in the way, is easily damaged, knocks everything over and stings when it is switching around. So I am quite happy with the standard as origianlly written. That is what I want to keep. What everyone else does not seem to understand is that it will be the demise of the breed. DPCA is fighting hard right now to keep the standard from being opened because once it is opened the breed is lost. Then others will be making the decisions not people who know the Doberman like the back of their hand.
Look at what happened to Australia the first year the ban was in place reg dropped by 50%??? That is a hugh drop. We can't afford that kind of drop in reg and the breed sustain itself.
If you are trying to tell me appearance does not matter I beg to differ - Look at the money people spend on image, plastic surgery, cosemetics, hair dressing and color - appearance matters. Why are there more uncropped dogs in rescue -
And I still want to know where you see so many ugly cropped dogs. If Canada has embraced floopy earred dogs then it is their loss. I see far more uncropped very very poorly bred dobermans - just visit any of the rescues - it is obvious that they did not come from top breeders. who were following a standard.
I wanted to emphasize that genetic health problems in Dobermans are much higher risk for the breed destruction than cropping and docking ban.
Unfortunately I see many poor bred Dobermans with cropped ears. Many of them goes through 2 major surgeries before they are 1 year old and die at 3-5. That's very painful to watch.
If you could please explain the statment about the 2 major surgeries - are you referring to copping and docking and spay/neuter or what was that in reference to??? Just so you know cropping and dockingis not a major surgery - It is not invasive and puppies are cropped at 3 to 5 days of age plus dews removed - all non invasive.