Maybe I can word this differently.Gelcoater, I am sure the fault with your not understanding lies with the author and not with you the reader. This is one of the cases were "I" know what I mean but didn't state it plainly enough to be understood.
The Act vs React statement is something I strive for in my training, it is a very hard thing to do and takes the right dog and trainer to accomplish. However protection work is all about the training. With the end goal being a "Trained" dog perfectly under control and a good neighbor and good friend in all circumstances. One that acts with confidence and is trained well enough to have that confidence. The act part of this comes through the training. If you are a good enough trainer and have a dog able to respond to that training, the dog through repetition will learn to Act in a given situation because of his or her training. Because of this training and the repetition the dog is Acting as opposed to Reacting.
I also would like to state here, that finding the right dog with the right aptitude and desire are critical in accomplishing the task and that is a well trained and focused protection dog. If there is a failing here after you have picked the best candidate possible it always lies with the trainer or the training.
Well I hope I did a better job that time, but after reading and rereading it a couple of times I am not sure I have explained the thoughts I have running through my head that provoked that response in the first place.
Roland
In this video the dogs have little to no training,the one that did engage has some.
Lets suppose for a second we replaced these untrained dogs with highly trained dogs.
In either case aren't the dogs reacting to an intruder?Their response isn't an act but a reaction to someone entering.





