What's your opinion on this (Pit Bulls)

To me it appears that in today's world, great effort is being made to "humanize" dogs, cats, iguanas, animals in general. And being so media-driven, it seems to be working. They've even come out with "health insurance" for pets. I haven't seen life insurance advertised, but have read of eccentrics leaving estates to animals. My pets have been a part of the family since arrival but I understand that first and foremost, they are Animals and carry ALL things that are common to animals. And "can be" just as sociopathic-predatory as "some" humans. "We" must be vigilant. :)

We are big advocates for our pet insurance. I don't think it humanizes our dog; I think it puts us in a better spot to make decisions about her health without the cost of care being a concern.
 
I think it puts us in a better spot to make decisions about her health without the cost of care being a concern.

My opinion:
All Health decisions should/could be made before you have a medical situation. (With or without insurance).

The time to decide is not while you are under pressure of an emergency or illness...you may or may not make a poor choice.

Factors like cost and quality of life need to be thought out before you're thrown into an emergency....

Have a plan in place before you need one...And yes Insurance helps.:)

BEEN HERE, DONE THAT

:usa::dobe::cool:
 
They've even come out with "health insurance" for pets.
This is something I wish I had when my last girl Gracie was alive. I have it on my twins and am thankful for it.
While I understand they are animals, I also understand my responsibility to them to provide the best that I can to keep and maintain their health and well being. Unexpected events can occur that could drain your account in an emergency situation. Having insurance is peace of mind to know I won’t be faced with the decision to euthanize because I cannot afford life saving surgery for my animals.
 
Oi vei.

I'm going to keep this short.

Most dogs labeled as "pit bulls" are anything but actual American pit bull terriers.

Like ANY high drive, working breed - they require special owners. Dog/animal agreession is common in the breed, it just it, it's genetic just like working traits in other breeds. A "good" example of an APBT will be tenacious and loyal. They will be animal aggressive, especially towards dogs, but NOT in a totally uncontrollable batcrap way. Just like other working breeds, they will know when it's ok and when it's not. Some of the most fearsome fighters can walk a yard with other dogs with zero issue, but put them in a box and it's a totally different story.

Bite stats are a joke. They combine 30+ breeds into one category and call it "pit bull". Many of these dogs are just mutts.

Yes, pitbulls DO have a unique bite style in the sense that they grab and hold. No jaws don't "lock" but they have really amazing bite grips. This was bred for intentionally. It's what makes them so dangerous when they do "attack".

I will go to my grave believing the biggest issue with "put bulls" in the broad sense of the word is crappy breeding practices. If every one and their brother was breeding any other "breed" with absolutely zero regard to overall health and temperament, they'd experience the SAME issues. A poorly bred dog of ANY breed(s) can be dangerous.

Just like our beloved Dobermanns, they're not a dog for everyone, or even most. But in the right hands, a well bred pit is an amazing animal. They're strength and tenacity is stunning. Especially when you consider they really are not big dogs. Males should top out around 60 pounds.
 
Let's beat this dead horse a bit more. Great points made by rits, cscallan and regalis. Pit bull is not a breed but a blanket generalization for any dog that MIGHT even slightly resemble one. Pit bull mauls sells (as evident by this thread) mutt mauls does not. People love to debate the "pit bull controversy", a horrible trend if I say so myself. The actual American Pit Bull Terrier is bred to fight other dogs, and at that they excel admirably. Mentioned previously you just cannot have a dog with those kind of capabilities with even an ounce of human aggression, a true APBT is the soundest companion you could ask for. However when you mix dogs that are highly athletic and driven, with random unproven and unsound of mind genetics is when you create a recipe for disaster.

I have had APBT most of my life and honestly probably always will. My Odyssey is the best dog I have ever had. She is true registered via American Dog Breeders Association APBT, an old registry that specifically promotes the preservation of the game bred pit. I can take her literally anywhere and do anything, wish I could say the same for my (big) bundle of joy that is Brinks. I do not watch or pay attention to the news for quite some time, as journalism appears to be a dead art amidst the disgusting trend of sensationalist negativity.
 
They've even come out with "health insurance" for pets



Veterinary care can be very expensive. I personally am very grateful we decided to go with insurance for my dogs. My male was recently diagnosed with DCM. A very expensive disease to treat. The meds alone are outrageous then add in holters and echoes and you're talking a fortune. Most people can't afford the treatment and end up putting the dog down. Very sad because it limits the knowledge we can learn about the disease which could save countless lives in the future.
We had a guest in our home recently, an owner of 2 dobermans that tried telling me I was crazy for treating Drake. He said the Cardiologist was just getting rich off me. I had to ask what he will say to me if we learn something from his treatment that saves one of his dogs someday?
In my world pet insurance is a good thing.
 
Oh, and as to the mind set that that type of dog is not needed in today's world ...

Look into hog hunting. Game bred pits and mixes of similar breeds are the top catch dogs. It takes a very unique dog to go in and take down and hold a hog that can easily kill them. The tenacity and strength that makes them so "dangerous" is also what makes them awesome catch dogs.

Working dogs in general just don't belong in the hands of most of society. Can anyone imagine what would happen if people did to Dobermans what's been done with "pits"? Not only are they true working dogs at the core, and been bred very poorly but then people have intentionally added in bad traits such as human aggression to make "guard dogs". It's a mess. A true to standard APBT should never, ever be human aggressive. Dogmen of yesteryear culled any dog with HA immediately because it was such an undesirable trait. But culling is wholly unpopular these days.
 
as journalism appears to be a dead art amidst the disgusting trend of sensationalist negativity.
The journalists today are nothing more than fiction writers and it saddens me to see all the false and negative narratives that are spewed on a daily basis. I grew up with the likes of Cronkite, Huntley, Brinkley where they were looked up to for their truthful unbiased reporting. We trusted them to get accurate news and they left the fiction and novellas to the Soap writers.
I noticed the change to sensationalism come about more forcefully during the OJ Simpson infamous Bronco coverage. People tuned in to that in droves. Ratings were higher than they had ever been and I believe that was the start of the reality tv that has flooded the airwaves and has taken root into every aspect of tv as we know it, including the embellishment of news to the advantage of ratings and their own agendas.
The term Pit Bull in a news article is what sells and the dogs are a scapegoat for what is occurring in attacks. Why not find a solution to the problem by going after BYB, Greeders, irresponsible owners. Personally I would love to see DNA done on these dogs to determine their true breed mix and then have an honest reporting on it. It will amaze JQP to realize that the majority of these dogs are NOT pit bulls!!
 
So, the past few months the dogs were kept in pens, outside in cold weather, under-fed and under-socialized. Due to RL troubles she left them with her dad but he didn't take care of them because they weren't his, it was reported. She only saw them 5x a week.

Awful... Sadly, this abuse is what led to her demise. I agree with the trainer when it comes to extreme neglect like these dogs faced.

"at the end of the day, dogs are animals, and in extreme circumstances, they can potentially view even their owners as threats or food sources."
 
@Regalis I grew up with great family friends that were huge into hog hunting with dogs. ANY dog that ever bit someone, even a nip, was culled. As they should be. Too many good dogs out there deserving of homes to put up with man biters. All of these dogs were sweet as can be to people, and when in the field they were outfitted with leathers and gps.
 
@Regalis I grew up with great family friends that were huge into hog hunting with dogs. ANY dog that ever bit someone, even a nip, was culled. As they should be. Too many good dogs out there deserving of homes to put up with man biters. All of these dogs were sweet as can be to people, and when in the field they were outfitted with leathers and gps.

Exactly! But dear God don't let the animal rights fruit loops know that culling is a GOOD thing. It always kills me when people rally to save a dog that has attacked/killed/maimed a human being when we don't even have homes for all the stable dogs to go to.

But they are then ok with killing a dog that has killed another animal. It's really perplexing to me.

Human aggression that is unwarranted is my number one big NOT ACCEPTABLE. Nipping while playing or as a puppy? Whatever. Because they are seriously injured or in pain? I can even be ok with that. But unwarranted biting or aggression? Nuh uh. It ends with a bullet. And I only let the being sick one fly to a degree. I've had two dogs now that had cancer that ended up getting into the brain and seriously altering their temperament. Both were euthanized before it could escalate to a point that I couldn't return from or forgive myself. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE my dogs. They're spoiled brats. But they are still very much animals and capable of doing animal things. Like these two did. I personally know several dogs that can not be trusted around other animals/dogs but are completely fine with all humans. Which is a very important thing to note when talking about "put bulls" in particular. My old boy was totally fine around both humans and animals of any sort (he got his ass kicked by a devil cat :) ) he was pure game bred from old family red lines. I could take him ANYWHERE. He went to pet stores, big indoor flea markets, fireworks, you name it. He was a rock star. UNLESS another dog instigated a fight. The first time he was just a teeny little 12 week old puppy, relatives Bassett bitch nailed him as he walked by (she had issues with other dogs and I didn't know this at the time) he turned around and laid her nose wide open. A 12 week old puppy! Any other puppy would have run away whimpering and crying. But he never ever started a fight and I could put him in a sit/stay in sketchy situations with off leash dogs coming at us. Wish I could say the same for the dobermutt ;)

I really do wonder what actually transpired to trigger the dogs into attacking. Was she passing out treats and due to their recent care it went south? Were they just that hungry? Anyone who's been around abused/neglected dogs knows full well that until they are safe, stable and realize they will no longer starve, it's pretty sketchy and you have to be extremely careful. Some dogs never rebound from it.

I'd also like to see DNA done (even though my understanding is that it's not all that accurate) because from the pictures I've seen, I'd say they are mixes at best. Which goes right back into my poorly bred thing. I'm not sure how it is in other areas, but around here, even in the city where dig fighting occurs, true pure bred APBTS are pretty rare. Most are what I call Detroit Bully Specials. A mix of God knows what that just so happens to look "pit" to the general public. Some of them are fantastic dogs. Some of them are flat out insane. Not only are they poorly bred, but in an attempt to make "guard" dogs, people have purposely bred in human aggression. For obvious reasons, that doesn't end well. The typical dog owner has no business owning a working dog, let alone one bred to be human aggressive. We're talking people who don't exercise, don't feed well or properly, house outdoors, don't train (or train in hideous ways), don't contain, etc their dogs. I always wonder, if instead of bully breeds they were using malinois or dobes or similar breeds - would anyone really be shocked when the dogs snap and attack?

And journalism. Ugh. I think the media and publicity around "pit bulls" is partially to blame for this mess. We have folks running around declaring that if you just love fido enough, his genetics don't matter. As long as you don't abuse or neglect them, they'll never ever attack a human or animal. The dreaded "nanny dog" myth. FFS, dog men didn't breed game dogs to be babysitters. It's just not true. Genetics matter. Yes, how a dog is raised and handled/managed also matters. But a herder will always be a herder. The fluke collie that doesn't have herding instincts is just that, a fluke, not breed norm. And many, many many bully breeds have similar histories to the APBT. They were bred as sporting/hunting/working dogs. We see it in smaller terriers all the time - the jack that kills mice with expert precision despite zero training to do so. But suddenly when we talk about bully breeds their genetics don't matter and they MUST have been abused/neglected/trained to kill.

Just ugh. News like this is why I will likely never own another bully. As horrible as it sounds, I was slightly relieved when my old boy passed. It's crazy enough owning a dobe. But with a bully, no matter what, your dog will be blamed and it won't be pretty. The liability is insane. Hell, even if your dog isn't the guilty party at all, it may be blamed if something happens in your neighborhood.
 
I know there is an active member who is not at all a fan of Pits. I forget who it is. I thought we all might enjoy this vid.

Matt Walsh is pretty funny here. It is, however, embarrassing for him that as a guy who acts pretty highbrow he pronounces Cane Corso like so many of our inner city friends: Cane (like candy cane) Corso. :facepalm:

 
Good video @Oh Little Oji - I'm not anti-pitbull, I'm anti-irresponsible owner. And since about 80% of dogs in shelters are pits or pit-mix, that's what gets adapted by JQP and JQP is notoriously irresponsible. And the shelters are irresponsible for adopting these dogs out as "lab mixes" and other made-up names according to the color so that uneducated people who don't have a clue are sent home thinking they have a sweet dog. And they do as long as they train it to be obedient, keep it in a well fenced yard or on leash, and for Gods sake don't get more than one dog. Almost every PB (or any dog) attack is by 2 or more. And almost every attack on someone outside the family is - guess what? - dogs running loose, usually in a pack. Not a dog that got away from it's handler, a dog that wasn't on a leash to begin with. Almost every single time. Also because these dogs are at large they come home pregnant and there's the new generation of "cute puppies" at the Walmart parking lot for $20 and at the shelter 8 months later... this all begins & ends with an irresponsible human.
 
Good video @Oh Little Oji - I'm not anti-pitbull, I'm anti-irresponsible owner. And since about 80% of dogs in shelters are pits or pit-mix, that's what gets adapted by JQP and JQP is notoriously irresponsible. And the shelters are irresponsible for adopting these dogs out as "lab mixes" and other made-up names according to the color so that uneducated people who don't have a clue are sent home thinking they have a sweet dog. And they do as long as they train it to be obedient, keep it in a well fenced yard or on leash, and for Gods sake don't get more than one dog. Almost every PB (or any dog) attack is by 2 or more. And almost every attack on someone outside the family is - guess what? - dogs running loose, usually in a pack. Not a dog that got away from it's handler, a dog that wasn't on a leash to begin with. Almost every single time. Also because these dogs are at large they come home pregnant and there's the new generation of "cute puppies" at the Walmart parking lot for $20 and at the shelter 8 months later... this all begins & ends with an irresponsible human.
Sure, people being responsible would all but end the problem of pit-type dogs attacking/mauling people and pets.

This raises an important question: Can we ever expect people in any appreciable numbers to be responsible? Do we not do several things in our society to make up for the careless, clueless, irresponsible behavior of people? It is mandatory to wear seatbelts. It is mandatory to register and insure one's motor vehicle and take a test in order to become licensed to operate one. One might say, yes that's because accidents happen. I say that we should stop calling car crashes accidents. Most of them could be avoided via responsible behavior. Motor vehicles have a tremendous dangerous potential. That is the same thing that I believe bully breeds have: dangerous potential.

Of course, there are gun laws we could use as an example as well.

What am I proposing? I'm not sure at this point. Maybe it's having to attain a special permit to own or house a Pit. This might include education and training. Fines might be sharply higher for any Pit type dog bite or attack. Fines might be higher for finding one at large. But all of these are government regulations and restrictions. I'm not really for big government intrusion.

You'd also have to enforce all these laws! That ain't gonna happen, especially in today's America! I'm not sure if we're in the Hott Topics section, but I bet such laws would be called "racist" today, and enforcing them would be called targeting or profiling.

Then of course you'd have to be able to find the actual owners, which would prove difficult.

You make good points regarding the unfortunate cycle to all the Pit problems. Yes, it is vastly worse when these dogs present in numbers greater than one! This is where their innate drives to attack and keep attacking are strongest. It's a frenzy.

I admire a good Pit Bull. If I were single and didn't have children I'd consider one. There's a member here who breeds Dobes with an eye toward sort of a throwback and working ability goal. She was breeding Pit Bulls of the old actual working type years ago.
 
You make good points regarding the unfortunate cycle to all the Pit problems.
Unfortunately it's pretty easy to define the problem but have no answers. I don't like to see some dogs get ID'd as dangerous and others not, because the next thing you know all the visually threatening dogs - like a Doberman - would be on the list as well. Personally, I wouldn't single out the pitbull with the regulations you mentioned. I'd say every single dog and every single owner and every single time and zero tolerance. If 80% were PB owners, that would not be targeted, that would just be facts. It would take some input from some members here in European countries, but I'm pretty sure they don't have dogs running at large as a common problem, if at all. This is a huge problem in the U.S. and it's fixable by clearly defined laws reinforced by fines to the owners and euthanasia for unclaimed dogs. I wouldn't object to requiring chips attaching original breeder information. No matter who ends up with the dog, the breeder can be contacted. This would be especially affective to oust BYB's. But again, it's not going to happen, so just wishful thinking here. Guilty parties need to pay for this mess, not innocent bystanders.
 
In Australia all dogs are required to be microchipped at their first vet visit. Of course there are still some out on rural acreage that don't comply, but if that dog ever needs a vet then that will be done then as our vets require the dogs microchip number. America Pitbulls are banned in Australia, but of course there are dogs who look very much like them but are called by other names. I wonder what a Bandog might be? :rofl:

The problem is always irresponsible or ignorant dog owners that lead to dangerous situations, and there seems no real solution to that. Maybe a dog training and responsible owner course at primary school age? Kids would love that class for sure!
 

Back
Top