Yorkville, IL - Not Home Rule City

A

apbtmom76

The city officials are not very enthusiastic about the resident's proposal
to ban pit bulls, nevertheless, anyone in the area should attend the next
city council meeting on July 23 when this issue is slated for discussion.

Yorkville to consider resident's proposed pit bull ban

July 16, 2009
By ROWENA VERGARA rvergara@scn1. com

YORKVILLE -- Yorkville resident Lou Denny says he doesn't want to be afraid
to walk around his neighborhood.

But he can't help but fear the pit bull that lives in his apartment complex
or any other pit bull that may be on the street.

Denny has never been bitten or attacked by a pit bull. But a June 29
incident in Aurora involving a pit bull that bit a teenager, assaulted a
golden retriever and caused injury to the retriever's owner was enough for
Denny to wonder if pit bulls should be banned altogether.

At the very least, he would like to see the breed banned in Yorkville.

At 6 p.m. July 23, Yorkville's Public Safety Committee will discuss a pit
bull ban proposed by Denny. He plans to talk about the possibility of
placing the question of a ban on the ballot for the next election.

"I want to bring that awareness to the community. ... If these pit bulls get
loose, they're devastating, " Denny said. "I hope there's a crowd that's
supportive of this, and if there isn't, it will be a losing battle."

Getting issue on ballot

The rather unusual request to discuss a ban on a specific breed has sparked
questions of the ban's logic.

"Personally, I don't know how you could enforce it. But everybody has the
right to say their piece," said 1st Ward Alderman Wally Werderich, who heads
the Public Safety Committee.

Getting the question on the ballot could require a certain number of
residents to sign a petition in support of the referendum. If the pit bull
ban question were to appear on a future election ballot, it's possible for
it to be considered an advisory referendum. That means that if it passes, it
would be non-binding and would not affect current laws.

An advisory referendum was on last November's ballot for Kendall County, in
which voters defeated a measure asking the Illinois Legislature to allow
residents to carry concealed firearms.

"You can kind of see where a majority of the voters stand on a particular
subject," Werderich explained of the advisory referendum.

Existing laws

Mayor Valerie Burd also expressed concerns about enforcement of a possible
pit bull ban.
The city already has an ordinance regarding vicious domestic animals, she
said.

According to city code, any animal deemed vicious may be impounded or
euthanized. If an animal is released, the owner must post a sign visible
from 500 feet that the property contains a dangerous or vicious dog.

"We try not to target any special breed. It depends on the actions (the
animal) takes," Burd said.

Sgt. Barry Groesch, spokesman for the Yorkville Police Department, said
local police have not taken complaints about violent pit bulls, or vicious
dogs in general.

Yorkville also recently reinstated a leash law, which requires domestic
animals to be on leashes at all times if they're outside.

"We have had a couple calls here and there and have handled them," Groesch
said of enforcement of the leash law.

The July 23 meeting will take place in the conference room of City Hall at
800 Game Farm Road.

http://www.suburban chicagonews. com/beaconnews/ news/1669010, 2_1_AU16_ YOPITBUL
L_S1-090716. article
 
Yorkville eyes harsher penalties for dog attacks

July 24, 2009

By ROWENA VERGARA rvergara@scn1. com
YORKVILLE -- A pit bull ban here would be against state statute, but the
city's Public Safety Committee plans to talk about tougher penalties for dog
attacks in the future.

At Thursday's committee meeting, resident Lou Denny brought forward a
proposal for a referendum that would ask residents if they'd want to ban pit
bulls in Yorkville. He said he has received more than 40 signatures from
residents supporting the question for a future ballot.

If the pit bull ban question were to appear on any ballot, it would likely
be considered an advisory referendum, officials said. Such a referendum
would not change any current laws.

But according to state statute, non-home-rule communities, including
Yorkville, cannot create a regulation or ordinance specific to any breed.

Third Ward Alderman Marty Munns suggested that the city talk about tougher
penalties for dog attacks.

"Maybe there could be a discussion of making the penalties more severe on an
escalating scale. Somehow dog owners have to be responsible. We can't change
state law, but we can make ours stronger," Munns said.

Pit bull laws elsewhere

One Chicago-area community, Wheeling, enacted a pit bull ban years ago but
no longer has one in place.

Other towns like Buffalo Grove have enacted tougher ordinances specific to
pit bulls and rottweilers, but do not have bans on either dog.

According to Buffalo Grove code, owners of a rottweiler or pit bull terrier
must keep their dogs on a leash at least six feet long. Owners also must
provide an enclosed fence for their animal in their yard, and the animal is
required to stay within that fence at all times when outside. Owners also
must post signs at all entrances warning that dogs are on the premises.

In Cahokia, a town of about 15,000 not far from the Missouri border, owners
must provide a health record of the dog, a certificate of insurance and two
photos of the pit bull.

Pit bulls in Cahokia, like Buffalo Grove, must be enclosed by a fence and be
walked on a leash no longer than four feet. Pit bulls in Cahokia, however,
also must be fitted with a muzzle while outside an enclosed area.

The city of Denver has one of the most well-known pit bull bans in the
country. The
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals claims that the
city has euthanized about 1,100 dogs since the pit bull ban was reinstated
in 2005.

But people who moved out of the city plan to move forward with claims that
the city's breed-specific laws are irrational.

Prince George's County in Maryland also has a longstanding pit bull ban,
according to the ASPCA. The organization claims that about 900 pit bulls are
killed every year there.

Ohio also classifies pit bulls as "vicious animals," and several cities have
bans, according to the ASPCA.

http://www.suburban chicagonews. com/beaconnews/ news/1683053, 2_1_AU24_ YOPITBUL
L_S1-090724. article
 
in germany we have the Ban for minimum 10 years if not longer.in Berlin i think you can't have them anymore,if you have one,you need a special permit,you can't breed them anymore,has to be on leash all the time.it might has change by now,but i think more to the worst then it would to the better :(
 
No dog ban for Yorkville
Comments


August 2, 2009

By ROWENA VERGARA rvergara@scn1. com
YORKVILLE -- A pit bull ban here would be against state statute, but the city's public safety committee plans to talk about tougher penalties for dog attacks in the future.

At Thursday's committee meeting, resident Lou Denny brought forward a proposal for a referendum that would ask residents if they want to ban pit bulls in Yorkville. He said he has received more than 40 signatures from residents supporting the question for a future ballot.

If the pit bull ban question were to appear on any ballot, it would likely be considered an advisory referendum, officials said. Such a referendum would not change laws.

According to state statute, non-home-rule communities, including Yorkville, cannot create a regulation or ordinance specific to any breed.

Third Ward Alderman Marty Munns suggested the city talk about tougher penalties for dog attacks instead.

"Maybe there could be a discussion of making the penalties more severe on an escalating scale. Somehow dog owners have to be responsible. We can't change state law, but we can make ours stronger," Munns said.

Pit bull laws elsewhere

One Chicago-area community, Wheeling, enacted a pit bull ban years ago but no longer has one in place.

Other towns like Buffalo Grove have enacted tougher ordinances specific to pit bulls and rottweilers, but do not have bans on either dog.

According to Buffalo Grove code, owners of a rottweiler or pit bull terrier must keep their dogs on a leash no longer than six feet. Owners also must provide an enclosed fence for their animal in their yard, and the animal is required to stay within that fence at all times when outside. Owners also must post signs at all entrances warning that dogs are on the premises.

In Cahokia, a town of about 15,000 not far from the Missouri border, owners must provide a health record of the dog, a certificate of insurance and two photos of the pit bull.

Pit bulls in Cahokia, like Buffalo Grove, must be enclosed by a fence and be walked on a leash no longer than four feet. Pit bulls in Cahokia, however, also must be fitted with a muzzle while outside an enclosed area.

Denver has one of the most well-known pit bull bans in the country. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals claims that the city has euthanized about 1,100 dogs since the pit bull ban was reinstated in 2005.

But people who moved out of the city plan to move forward with claims that the city's breed-specific laws are irrational.

Prince George's County in Maryland also has a longstanding pit bull ban, according to the ASPCA. About 900 pit bulls are killed every year there, they say. Ohio also classifies pit bulls as "vicious animals," and several cities have bans, according to the ASPCA.





http://www.suburban chicagonews. com/heraldnews/ news/1696370, 4_1_JO02_ YORKDOG_S1- 090802.article
 

Back
Top